owenpan added a comment. In D141654#4052510 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D141654#4052510>, @HazardyKnusperkeks wrote:
> In D141654#4050852 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D141654#4050852>, @rymiel wrote: > >> (This needs to run the updated dump script from D138446 >> <https://reviews.llvm.org/D138446>) >> >> I'm not sure what the strict //benefit// of squishing the two options >> together is, but I support it > > Having just one option instead of two, for one feature is better, especially > when the two options are that far apart in the documentation. +1. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D141654/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D141654 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
