erichkeane added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/include/clang/Basic/AttrDocs.td:1764
+  the ``external_source_symbol`` attribute with
+  ``__has_attribute(external_source_symbol_with_usr)``.
+
----------------
arphaman wrote:
> aaron.ballman wrote:
> > erichkeane wrote:
> > > I don't think we can do this.  __has_attribute needs to take the actual 
> > > name of the attribute.
> > +1
> `__has_attribute(external_source_symbol)` already works but it wouldn't help 
> here as it doesn't tell whether the attribute supports USR or not. Are you 
> saying I should come up with a totally new attribute that accepts USR? That 
> was originally why I had the `__has_feature` check.
The typical way of doing this in the standard is to have 
__has_c_attribute/__has_cpp_attribute return a larger non-zero value for the 
normal attribute.

I suspect we should extend `__has_attribute` to do something similar (that is, 
allowing Feature Test Macros' for it).  Aaron, WDYT?


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D141324/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D141324

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to