dblaikie added a comment. > I'd be interested to see the fixit-hints for the first bit, also to see how > others feel about it here.
My 2c is that `-Wparentheses` is already a very stylistic warning (even correct code, without knowing about this esoteric/specific suppression style of adding parens, is likely to be caught by this general class of diagnostic) so I'm pretty apprehensive about opening it up further - but data would be the decider. Running the proposed slices (different operators in different orders, etc) of warning over some broad codebases to get a sense of the false positive rate would be really helpful/necessary to decide which things to include and exclude. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D142800/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D142800 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
