cor3ntin added a comment. In D143109#4097775 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D143109#4097775>, @erichkeane wrote:
> @cor3ntin : Mind taking a look here? You're my lambda expert these days :) I did something similar to check the requires clause of a lambda and it does technically fix the issue, i don't see a more elegant solution, but it does sound a bit wrong... (it allocates a dummy function scope that is then kept around forever) Maybe we can add a fixme comment here and add a "remove lambda scope" with an raii object for these two cases in a separate PR? The issue is not surprising though, there are weird order of operations in how parameters and functions and their context are handled. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D143109/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D143109 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
