bcraig added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D23279#511187, @omtcyfz wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D23279#510234, @alexshap wrote: > > > > I do think that an automated tool will do a better job of changing field > > > orderings in a non-breaking way than most people would, mostly due to > > > initializer lists. > > > > > > yeah, that was the original motivation > > > How does that justify its current state, in which it does breaks codebases > with more than 1 TU? Yeah, that aspect probably needs work :). Accepting a compilation database seems like a good way to correct that. Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D23279 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
