JonChesterfield added a comment.

Reporting after another round of discussion. I don't have much support from the 
llvm openmp working group that we should maintain the current divergence from 
libc++ and the like so I'm backing down. Let's revert this and regress for all 
users who don't install globally.

The intent is to document in the FAQ things users can do themselves to replace 
the functionality here, where possibly one enumerated option is to pass 
--fopenmp-implicit-rpath (maybe renamed) though my preference would be to 
delete this code path from the compiler entirely if it's going to be a 
minimally-tested, non-default path (as it'll break and we won't notice).

@MaskRay please revert this patch at your leisure. I'm reluctantly consenting 
to the capability regression but not volunteering to fix any CI fallout from 
removing it.

@ronlieb I think we should keep this functionality in rocm so that rocm built 
binaries don't start going looking for llvm libs under /usr instead and fall 
over


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D118493/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D118493

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to