Neither does clang-tidy's right? Incidentally that's exactly what i was trying to add support for. Lldb has a mass reformat coming up, and as part of that we are defining an include ordering. But at the moment it won't do this, so we will be left fixing this by hand or not fixing it at all
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 12:36 AM Daniel Jasper <djas...@google.com> wrote: > djasper added a comment. > > I think we should entirely drop this implementation of the check and let > it just check #includes with clang-format. clang-format's implementation > isn't a strict superset, e.g. won't sort between multiple blocks, but > that's intentional for now. > > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D23434 > > > >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
