carlosgalvezp added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/readability/operators-representation.rst:28-29 + +Alternative Token Representation +-------------------------------- + ---------------- carlosgalvezp wrote: > Personally I find this to be a matter of style, and arguments could be found > for either style. As such I don't think this check should promote the style > preference of the author of the check. > > It's like having a written discussion in the clang-format option > `ColumnLimit` explaining why N characters is a better choice than M > characters. In the end this is a decision each project should take, and the > check should not have a bias towards a preferred choice. FYI @njames93 , do you have an opinion on the matter as Code Owner? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D144522/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D144522 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
