garvitgupta08 added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Gnu.cpp:978-986
+ if (Arg *A = Args.getLastArg(options::OPT_g_Flag, options::OPT_gN_Group,
+ options::OPT_gdwarf_2,
options::OPT_gdwarf_3,
+ options::OPT_gdwarf_4,
options::OPT_gdwarf_5,
+ options::OPT_gdwarf))
+ if (!A->getOption().matches(options::OPT_g0)) {
+ Args.AddLastArg(CmdArgs, options::OPT_g_Flag);
+ unsigned DwarfVersion = getDwarfVersion(getToolChain(), Args);
----------------
nickdesaulniers wrote:
> nickdesaulniers wrote:
> > garvitgupta08 wrote:
> > > nickdesaulniers wrote:
> > > > Isn't this potentially going to add `-gdwarf-` repeatedly if there's
> > > > many inputs?
> > > >
> > > > Wouldn't it be better to scan the inputs to see if there's any .S or .s
> > > > files, then add the flags once?
> > > Let me know if this is fine.
> > I don't think the current implementation addresses my point. Having
> > `CmdArgs.push_back` be called in a loop on the number of inputs will
> > potentially add the arg repeatedly.
> >
> > I think you should simply check if the `InputType` is asm or asm-with-cpp
> > in the loop, potentially setting a boolean scoped outside the loop. Then,
> > after the loop, decide whether to add the cmd arg.
> Specifically, if `llvm::any_of` the inputs are asm or asm-with-cpp, then we
> might want to modify the command line flags passed to the external assembler.
>
> We don't want to pass additional flags per input.
Done
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D145726/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D145726
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
