tbaeder added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/SemaCXX/static-assert.cpp:262
static_assert(invert(true) == invert(false), ""); // expected-error
{{failed}} \
- // expected-note
{{evaluates to 'false == true'}}
----------------
Krishna-13-cyber wrote:
> tbaeder wrote:
> > This diagnostic should be kept. From looking at the condition, it is not
> > obvious what the two functions evaluate to.
> The above Binary operator test case says that there are two Boolean
> expressions,**UsefulToPrintExpr** says we can avoid to print these
> expressions as they are don't need a note and are understandable.
>
> So if we go by this we will have to remove the note.By this we are removing
> note for boolean literals as well as expressions.It will be nice to make it
> generic rather than specifically target cases of false || false , false &&
> false. As the warning note print out the boolean values which can be avoided
> giving preference to the other diagnostics in terms of boolean literals and
> expressions.
I think you are confusing boolean expressions with boolean literals.
What is the problem with fixing this issue by simply ignoring toplevel `BO_LOr`
binary operators?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D146376/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D146376
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
