jrtc27 added a comment.

The field should just be deleted. D126742 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D126742> 
added it without any uses, and I don't know what the original intent was. Maybe 
it was used before the bitfields were added and it stuck around rather than 
being GC'ed. I don't know why Coverity would care about this though when it's 
never read from, there's nothing wrong with that, unless the warning is in fact 
that the field is entirely unreferenced?


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D146847/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D146847

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to