aprantl added a comment. In D146595#4225048 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D146595#4225048>, @dblaikie wrote:
> I know this is a bit of a redirection/scope creep/etc - but I'd quite like to > see a solution that is likely to be usable for the "std::function" problem > (stepping into std::function should allow you to reach the underlying > function - but lldb currently skips any call to a std-namespaced function, I > think, so you step right over the whole op() call) that could also cover the > Swift needs. Though perhaps they're just sufficiently different problems that > there is no generalizing here. This patch aims at exposing an existing LLVM IR & DWARF feature in clang. Having a generic solution for the std::function problem is definitely worthwhile investigating, but I'm not sure it needs to prevent supporting the existing mechanism in clang. I understand that this is nowhere near as flexible as a source-level solution, but in case you weren't aware of this, LLDB implements a custom step through plan for std::function: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/fd059ea7ec044198fd75bb2b3aa30734bcace33e/lldb/source/Plugins/LanguageRuntime/CPlusPlus/CPPLanguageRuntime.cpp#L368 Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D146595/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D146595 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
