SBallantyne added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/CommonArgs.h:111
+llvm::codegenoptions::DebugInfoKind
+DebugLevelToInfoKind(const llvm::opt::Arg &A);
+
----------------
awarzynski wrote:
> SBallantyne wrote:
> > awarzynski wrote:
> > > awarzynski wrote:
> > > > CamelCase or camelCase? ;-)
> > > Sorry, I meant that this function uses wrong casing. It ought to be 
> > > `debugLevelToInfoKind` and `addDebugInfoKind`: 
> > > https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#name-types-functions-variables-and-enumerators-properly
> > I thought that the general rule was that the style guide should be followed 
> > apart from when there is already code in a particular style in a file, 
> > however i have realised that while most functions in this file are 
> > `CamelCase`, there are some that are `camelCase`, so i am unsure of what is 
> > the right way.
> Yes, it's very confusing :(
> 
> You are right about the official guidelines (at least that's how I understand 
> them). In this case the style used in this file is inconsistent so you can't 
> follow that (i.e. because there are multiple styles used here). In situations 
> like this I would follow the official style guideline instead.
Sounds reasonable, I've changed it to follow style guideline instead.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D146814/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D146814

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to