rymiel added a comment. > didn't go via the normal clang-format reviewers
Is there a reason for this? This isn't the only case either, for example: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143070 https://reviews.llvm.org/D144170 https://reviews.llvm.org/D88299 https://reviews.llvm.org/D135356 I don't have a lot of experience here, so maybe I'm missing "historical" context, but this confuses me a lot... Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D147176/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D147176 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits