aaron.ballman added a comment. In D146595#4284220 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D146595#4284220>, @dblaikie wrote:
> In D146595#4281710 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D146595#4281710>, @aprantl wrote: > >> Now if we are going to say this explicitly DWARF only feature, that could be >> an argument to stick with the `trampoline` name. But I'd rather say this is >> a general feature that — at this point in time — is only implement on DWARF >> targets. > > Yeah, I'd be inclined to think of this as not a DWARF-specific feature, but > one only implemented in DWARF at the moment. If CV adds some way to inject > names into the database of uninteresting symbols, they could use this too. To clarify, my concerns with non-DWARF aren't of the "this needs to work with every debug format before we should accept it" variety. It's more of the "if other debug formats support this concept or conceivably would support this concept in the near future, would we need to materially change the attribute from what's proposed here?" kind. Basically, I want to try to avoid a situation where we have to introduce a second attribute for this same feature, or this attribute needs to be a decl attribute for DWARF and a type attribute for others, needs arguments for some reason, that sort of thing. I want to avoid having a set of attributes for DWARF and a different set of attribute code CodeView, basically. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D146595/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D146595 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
