faisalv added a comment. Address Richard's comments.
================ Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiateDecl.cpp:190 @@ -189,3 +189,3 @@ if (A->getCond()->isValueDependent() && !Cond->isValueDependent() && - !Expr::isPotentialConstantExprUnevaluated(Cond, cast<FunctionDecl>(Tmpl), + !Expr::isPotentialConstantExprUnevaluated(Cond, cast<FunctionDecl>(New), Diags)) { ---------------- rsmith wrote: > Do we have existing test coverage for this (tests that fail with the > ExprConstant change if we don't fix this at the same time)? Yes we do. That's how I realized it needed to be fixed - it's enable_if.cpp in SemaCXX that has the following test: template <typename T> T templatedBar(T m) attribute((enable_if(m > 0, ""))) { return T(); } https://reviews.llvm.org/D23493 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits