kito-cheng added a comment. > My concern would be that as we don't gate CSR names on enabling the relevant > extension, people could start using CSR names and encodings that could > change, without opting in via -menable-experimental-extensions, perhaps not > realising that they're using the unratified version. OTOH, you could argue it > was user error from the start by not trying to specify all the needed > extensions in the ISA naming string.
We decide don't gate CSR before, but I am wondering maybe we should gate those CSR if they are defined by a unratified/experimental ext., and remove the checking once it ratified, since it might change the name or CSR number before ratified. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D148066/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D148066 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
