nridge added a comment. In D143260#4328948 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D143260#4328948>, @kadircet wrote:
> Considering that we have added a bunch of token kinds, let me ask you another > question then, how many more new token kinds do we expect to have? e.g. if > label is the last one sure, but if we plan to have 10 more or if we don't > know how many more we would like to have, i think it's better to first come > up with a plan and an agreement to make sure we can avoid such discussions > with every attempt. does that sound fair? That's a totally fair question. For my part, I don't have any additional token kinds in mind to add. (The suggestion in https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/787 to split "template parameter" into type vs. non-type is an interesting one, but it's more like a nice-to-have enhancement.) Not sure about Qt Creator, will let @ckandeler chime in on whether he had any other token kinds in mind for it. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D143260/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D143260 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
