ilya-biryukov added a comment.

Thanks! This looks like a useful addition.

Could you add a test into `libIndex` for this too? Just for the sake of having 
better coverage, some folks probably don't run `clang-tools-extra` tests.
Also, could we add a test that a label does not get indexed if local function 
indexing is off?



================
Comment at: clang/lib/Index/IndexBody.cpp:148
+  bool VisitGotoStmt(GotoStmt *S) {
+    if (IndexCtx.shouldIndexFunctionLocalSymbols()) {
+      return IndexCtx.handleReference(S->getLabel(), S->getLabelLoc(), Parent,
----------------
`IndexingContext::handleReference` already has this check, we should call 
`handleReference` unconditionally.




================
Comment at: clang/lib/Index/IndexBody.cpp:158
+    if (IndexCtx.shouldIndexFunctionLocalSymbols()) {
+      return IndexCtx.handleReference(S->getDecl(), S->getIdentLoc(), Parent,
+                                      ParentDC, {});
----------------
We should call `handleDecl`, indexing output can differentiate between a 
declarations and a references.
`LabelStmt` is exactly the node that declares a `LabelDecl`.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D150124/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D150124

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to