codemzs marked an inline comment as done. codemzs added a comment. In D149573#4337480 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D149573#4337480>, @stuij wrote:
> I made a comment on the RFC > <https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-c-23-p1467r9-extended-floating-point-types-and-standard-names/70033> > to understand if we really need/want a new bfloat16 type. Thank you, @stuij, for your input. I will continue to follow the consensus on the RFC regarding the introduction of a new bfloat16 type. For context, my initial implementation transitioned the existing storage-only `__bf16` type into an arithmetic type. If the decision leans towards not introducing a new `bfloat16` type, I'm prepared to revert my changes to utilize the `__bf16` type. To ensure our collective efforts are effectively streamlined and avoid any potential duplication, I am committed to aligning my work with the community consensus and ongoing discussions. @tahonermann, when you have a moment, your guidance would be greatly appreciated. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D149573/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D149573 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
