rupprecht added a comment. In D150226#4338264 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D150226#4338264>, @shafik wrote:
> In D150226#4336755 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D150226#4336755>, @rupprecht > wrote: > >> We're still using `-Wno-enum-constexpr-conversion`, although I'm not sure if >> we need that or if we just forgot to remove it after doing some cleanup. I'm >> trying it out now. (Sorry, I'm not sure we were aware that having a way to >> turn this off was just temporary). > > Please let me know how things look on your end. It's not that bad, and all remaining breakages have fixes sent out now, but still waiting to land. A week or two is probably good enough for us. But I don't know about the rest of OSS mentioned in other comments. (FYI, I'll be out for a few weeks, and I might not have a chance to follow up before then) CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D150226/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D150226 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
