arsenm added a comment. In D151087#4360606 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D151087#4360606>, @jhuber6 wrote:
> In D151087#4360577 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D151087#4360577>, @ebevhan wrote: > >> What would be the semantics of such an operation if the address spaces are >> disjoint? Or, if the underlying pointer widths aren't the same? > > It would most likely invalid, but I'm not asserting that `clang` should be > responsible for diagnosing misuse in these cases. Especially because in > generic freestanding C++ we don't have any language options to suggest the > actual semantics. If the pointer sizes don’t match I think it has to be rejected since it’s no longer a pure bitcast Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D151087/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D151087 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
