mboehme marked an inline comment as done. ================ Comment at: include/clang/Analysis/CFG.h:526 @@ -524,1 +525,3 @@ typedef AdjacentBlocks::const_reverse_iterator const_pred_reverse_iterator; + typedef llvm::iterator_range<pred_iterator> pred_range; + typedef llvm::iterator_range<const_pred_iterator> pred_const_range; ---------------- alexfh wrote: > Most of the time the new functions will be used in a range-based for loop. I > don't think the type returned by the functions will need to be explicitly > specified anywhere. I'd remove the typedefs. I agree the typedefs will probably never be used outside this class, but typedefs for iterator_ranges seem to be a common pattern in the Clang codebase. (EnumDecl::enumerator_range and CallExpr::arg_range are two random examples.) I assume the intent is to make the definition of the functions that return these ranges less verbose.
Are you OK with me submitting this patch as-is (with the typedefs)? https://reviews.llvm.org/D23842 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
