yaxunl added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp:8475
         "triple=" + TC->getTripleString(),
-        "arch=" + Arch.str(),
+        "arch=" + getProcessorFromTargetID(TC->getTriple(), Arch).str(),
         "kind=" + Kind.str(),
----------------
jhuber6 wrote:
> saiislam wrote:
> > Shouldn't Arch (targetID here) should be passed along instead of just the 
> > processor?
> > 
> > For example, `gfx90a:xnack+` and `gfx90a:xnack-` should be treated 
> > differently.
> So the problem there is that this will cause us to no longer link in 
> something like the OpenMP runtime library since `gfx90a` != `gfx90a:xnack+`. 
> Right now the behavior is that we will link them both together since the 
> architecture matches but then the attributes will get resolved the same way 
> we handle `-mattr=+x,-x`. I'm not sure what the expected behaviour is here.
targetID is part of ROCm ABI as it is returned as part of Isa::GetIsaName 
(https://github.com/RadeonOpenCompute/ROCR-Runtime/blob/rocm-5.5.x/src/core/runtime/isa.cpp#L98)
 . 

the compatibility rule for targetID is specified by 
https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ClangOffloadBundler.html#target-id . For example, 
bundle entry with gfx90a can be consumed by device with GetIsaName 
gfx90a:xnack+ or gfx90a:xnack- . but bundle entry with gfx90a:xnack+ can only 
be consumed by device with GetIsaName gfx90a:xnack+.

Language runtime is supposed to do a compatibility check for bundle entry with 
the device GetIsaName. Isa::IsCompatible 
(https://github.com/RadeonOpenCompute/ROCR-Runtime/blob/3b939c398bdac0c2b9a860ff9a0ed0be0c80f911/src/core/runtime/isa.cpp#L73)
 can be used to do that. For convenience, language runtime is expected to use 
targetID for identifying bundle entries instead of re-construct targetID from 
features when needed.

targetID is also used for compatibility checks when linking bitcode.



Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D150998/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D150998

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to