jrtc27 added a comment. In D149867#4387189 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D149867#4387189>, @glaubitz wrote:
> In D149867#4386271 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D149867#4386271>, @jrtc27 wrote: > >> I disagree. Being experimental doesn't mean you should do the wrong thing. >> Reusing stdcall in the frontend is ugly, pollutes non-m68k code paths (doing >> your own thing _avoids_ that and makes the experimental backend get out of >> the way, even) and introduces a bug where you can write garbage code and >> have it compile rather than be rejected like it should be. > > Maybe we can get the TLS stuff merged first before dealing with this more > complex change? They're totally independent, so nothing's blocking that being merged. Plus this isn't a complex change to make, just a bunch of copy pasta. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D149867/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D149867 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
