MyDeveloperDay added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/docs/ClangFormatStyleOptions.rst:4709
+
+**SpaceAfterOperatorKeyword** (``Boolean``) :versionbadge:`clang-format 17`
:ref:`¶ <SpaceAfterOperatorKeyword>`
+ If ``true``, a space will be inserted after the 'operator' keyword.
----------------
could we use something like `SpaceAfterOperatorDeclaration` to differentiate
================
Comment at: clang/docs/ClangFormatStyleOptions.rst:4719
+
+**SpaceAfterOperatorKeywordInCall** (``Boolean``) :versionbadge:`clang-format
17` :ref:`¶ <SpaceAfterOperatorKeywordInCall>`
+ If ``true``, a space will be inserted after the 'operator' keyword in a call
expression.
----------------
I'm not going to lie I'm not a fan of `SpaceAfterOperatorKeywordInCall` as an
option name, any other suggestions for a name?
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp:3762
}
+
// co_await (x), co_yield (x), co_return (x)
----------------
kind of unrelated change?
================
Comment at: clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp:22916
+ Style.SpaceAfterOperatorKeywordInCall = true;
+ verifyFormat("foo.operator ==();", Style);
+ verifyFormat("foo.Foo::operator ==();", Style);
----------------
I assume I could have `foo->operator ==();`
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D152443/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D152443
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
