paulkirth added a comment. The point of this patch was to show a regression. I'm not trying to fix anything per se. I'd like https://reviews.llvm.org/D151954 and anything that depends on it reverted, since it breaks `clang-format`. My understanding was that @owenpan was reluctant to revert since they couldn't reproduce the issue, but now that they can, I don't see why this can't go in (with a modified summary) after the revert (or as part of it).
I can of course revert those patches here, but it didn't make sense to me to do that, since it wouldn't show the regression. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D152473/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D152473 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits