ManuelJBrito added a comment. In D142388#4425246 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D142388#4425246>, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> In D142388#4415349 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D142388#4415349>, @rsmith wrote: > >> I think `__builtin_any_value` works pretty well, and emphasizes that this >> can really return any value. I'd also be OK with >> `__builtin_convenient_value`, to emphasize that the compiler will pick >> something that's convenient for it, but I prefer `__builtin_any_value`. > > I can get behind `__builtin_any_value` as the name. > > @ManuelJBrito: would you be willing to make these modifications? Yes, I can change the name to `__builtin_any_value` . Where do we stand in terms of further restricting the types for which we can use this? I'm a bit out of my depth in regards to all the subtleties. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D142388/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D142388 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
