gedare added a comment. In D153205#4430528 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D153205#4430528>, @owenpan wrote:
> It seems to me that there has been a proliferation of new options being > proposed and/or accepted recently. I'd like to remind everyone of the > long-standing policy > <https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ClangFormatStyleOptions.html#adding-additional-style-options> > of adding new options. That being said, I wonder if we should add a new > language `LK_C` along with its variants C78 (i.e. K&R C), C89 (i.e. ANSI C), > GNU extensions (e.g. #55745 > <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/55745> and #62755 > <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/62755>), etc. Understood. In this case, the `BK_ListInit` is not visible at the API / Style level. It is an internal categorization to help distinguish different kinds of blocks. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D153205/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D153205 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
