massberg marked an inline comment as done. massberg added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/unittests/HoverTests.cpp:4051 +TEST(Hover, RewrittenBinaryOperatorSpaceshipMassberg) { + Annotations T(R"cpp( ---------------- sammccall wrote: > massberg wrote: > > massberg wrote: > > > sammccall wrote: > > > > sammccall wrote: > > > > > no need to sign your work :-) > > > > can you add this to HoverTest__All instead? That way we test all > > > > details of the hover card > > > Upps, sorry. > > > can you add this to HoverTest__All instead? That way we test all details > > > of the hover card > > > > The (Hover, All) test tests with `std=c++17` while this test tests c++20 > > features. > > We could add an additional field with the version to the struct in the > > (Hover, All) test. > > Or add a (Hover, All_Cpp20) test for testing C++20 (what is probably not > > worth at the moment with just one test requiring C++20). > Does anything break if you switch everything to C++20? > The intention of "std=c++17" there was certainly "not 14", rather than "not > 20" :-) Test test passed with C++20. I have switch it to C++20 and moved the new test as a new case in this test. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D153331/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D153331 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits