ChuanqiXu added a comment. > Oh, I guess we're somehow adding a semi-resolved form of the base class type > of D into the ODR hash, which then includes details of the using-declaration. > That seems wrong -- we should either (preferably) be including only the > syntactic form of the base specifier (because local syntax is what the ODR > covers), or the canonical type (which should be the same for both > using-declarations).
Got it. I'll try to fix it. Thanks for the suggestion. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D153003/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D153003 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
