nikic added a comment. In D86993#4477080 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D86993#4477080>, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> In D86993#4474682 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D86993#4474682>, @nikic wrote: > >>> I continue to think it's a mistake for us to document that Clang will not >>> work with a conforming C standard library implementation unless we're >>> filing issues with WG14 to alert them to the reasons why. If there's a DR >>> filed with the committee, that gives us something to point our users to as >>> justification. Otherwise, our users will correctly put these bugs at our >>> feet. >> >> As you are involved with WG14, can you please take care of that? I couldn't >> even find out how one is supposed to file a DR. > > I'm happy to help with it, but I'll need some outside help as well so I get > the technical details and justifications correct and can defend them when > presenting to the committee. If someone could put together a super rough > draft of what changes we'd like to see and why, I can definitely work with > them to polish it into a final document, get it to the committee, and > champion it there. Related question though: what do we do if the committee > rejects the DR? I think LLVM and Clang have slightly different pressures > here, so we might have different answers. > > FWIW, you can find more info here about how to communicate with WG14: > https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/contributing Thank you! I will prepare an initial draft and share it here. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D86993/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D86993 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
