wangpc planned changes to this revision. wangpc added a comment. I don't have any thoughts on this patch now.
In D125765#4511637 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D125765#4511637>, @eopXD wrote: > Sorry for the late reply, I missed this in may mails. > > I see that the motivation start from where you spotted this type alias. > However it was essentially just an act for convenience so we don't have to > map a more irregular pattern of ( _Float16, float, double) when generating > the test cases by code. Is it necessary that we have them in the header? On > the other hand, these are scalar floating-point types, and if we want them to > be defined, I agree with Zakk that starting a discussion in riscv-c-api will > be helpful. Yeah, I agree. But I won't continue this now. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D125765/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D125765 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
