shafik added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp:14001 + + if (FnDecl->isInvalidDecl()) + return ExprError(); ---------------- shafik wrote: > It feels a bit weird that we are succeeding in finding the best viable > function and what we find is invalid. It looks like we have a couple of test that generate the `cannot be variadic` diagnostic for overloads e.g. `clang/test/SemaCXX/overloaded-operator-decl.cpp` it might be worth looking into why they don't crash and this case does. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D156244/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D156244 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
