aaron.ballman added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst:103-137 +- When describing the failure of static assertion of `==` expression, clang prints the integer + representation of the value as well as its character representation when + the user-provided expression is of character type. If the character is + non-printable, clang now shows the escpaed character. + Clang also prints multi-byte characters if the user-provided expression + is of multi-byte character type. + ---------------- cor3ntin wrote: > @aaron.ballman One one hand this is nice, on the other hand maybe too > detailed. What do you think? I'm happy with it -- better too much detail than too little, but this really helps users see what's been improved and why it matters. That said, I think `0x0A` and `0x1F30D` would arguably be better than printing the values in decimal. For `\n`, perhaps folks remember that it's decimal value 10, but nobody is going to know what `127757` means compared to the hex representation (esp because the value is specified in hex with the prefix printed in the error message). WDYT? CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D155610/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D155610 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
