4vtomat marked an inline comment as done. 4vtomat added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/test/Sema/rvv-required-features-invalid.c:16 +void test_sf_vc_x_se_u64m1(uint64_t rs1, size_t vl) { // expected-note {{'test_sf_vc_x_se_u64m1' declared here}} + __riscv_sf_vc_x_se_u64m1(1, 1, 1, rs1, vl); // expected-error {{call to undeclared function '__riscv_sf_vc_x_se_u64m1'}} expected-note {{did you mean 'test_sf_vc_x_se_u64m1'?}} +} ---------------- craig.topper wrote: > This doesn't mention the xsfvcp extension. So it doesn't look like the > diagnostic in the code is being hit. I guess it's just because `__riscv_sf_vc_x_se_u64m1` is too similar to `test_sf_vc_x_se_u64m1`, I just changed the name of the function, and the diagnostic just disappeared. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D157474/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D157474 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits