rupprecht added a comment. The other common breakage I'm seeing is code that hasn't yet migrated from the "PRI" format macros, of which there's an example in LLVM itself: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/6a0e536ccfef1f7bd64ee4153b4efc0aeecf28d4/clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx11-compat.cpp#L38
e.g.: https://godbolt.org/z/v3boc9E6T > IMHO, people should stop using -Wno-reserved-user-defined-literal and > exploiting the addition of a whitespace to mingle pre-c++11 and post-c++11 > code. I mostly agree with this, at least the spirit of it, but do we usually remove the `-Wno` ability to suppress a common error because we don't like it? (Or justify it post-facto if we accidentally did that?) If removing this is important for some other aspect of clang development, it would be nice to have notice ahead of time that this option will go away. I guess +1 to what James said. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D153156/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D153156 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
