[clang] [Clang] Fix the for statement disappearing in AST when an error occurs in the conditional expression of the for statement (PR #65381)

[Shafik Yaghmour via cfe-commits]

================
@@ -2158,8 +2158,10 @@ StmtResult Parser::ParseForStatement(SourceLocation 
*TrailingElseLoc) {
         // for-range-declaration next.
         bool MightBeForRangeStmt = !ForRangeInfo.ParsedForRangeDecl();
         ColonProtectionRAIIObject ColonProtection(*this, MightBeForRangeStmt);
+        SourceLocation SecondPartStart = Tok.getLocation();
+        Sema::ConditionKind CK = Sema::ConditionKind::Boolean;
         SecondPart = ParseCXXCondition(
-            nullptr, ForLoc, Sema::ConditionKind::Boolean,
+            nullptr, ForLoc, CK,
             // FIXME: recovery if we don't see another semi!
             /*MissingOK=*/true, MightBeForRangeStmt ? &ForRangeInfo : nullptr,
             /*EnterForConditionScope*/ true);
----------------
shafik wrote:

```suggestion
            /*InitStmt=*/nullptr, ForLoc, CK,
            // FIXME: recovery if we don't see another semi!
            /*MissingOK=*/true, MightBeForRangeStmt ? &ForRangeInfo : nullptr,
            /*EnterForConditionScope=*/true);
```

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65381
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits