aaron.ballman added a comment.

In D151834#4644391 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D151834#4644391>, @zahiraam wrote:

> In D151834#4644378 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D151834#4644378>, @aaron.ballman 
> wrote:
>
>> In D151834#4644375 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D151834#4644375>, @zahiraam 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> In D151834#4644373 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D151834#4644373>, 
>>> @aaron.ballman wrote:
>>>
>>>> In D151834#4643925 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D151834#4643925>, @uabelho 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi @zahiraam ,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a couple of downstream testcases that fail with this patch.
>>>>> Before
>>>>>
>>>>>   > clang bbi-86364.c -lm -O3
>>>>>   > ./a.out
>>>>>
>>>>> passed but with the patch the assert in the program fails:
>>>>>
>>>>>   a.out: bbi-86364.c:9: int main(): Assertion `(*__errno_location ()) == 
>>>>> 33' failed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this as expected?
>>>>>
>>>>> F29200339: bbi-86364.c <https://reviews.llvm.org/F29200339>
>>>>
>>>> This seems unexpected to me and it seems to relate to whether you include 
>>>> errno.h or not: https://godbolt.org/z/EPWzazx9r -- @zahiraam do you have 
>>>> ideas as to what's going on?
>>>
>>> I haven't looked at it as I saw that the comment has been deleted. Let me 
>>> look into it.
>>
>> Oh, it's not the inclusion of errno.h that matters, it's the declaration of 
>> `__errno_location`: https://godbolt.org/z/zo4PaPEME -- it seems that 
>> inclusion of `__attribute__ ((__const__))` is what makes the distinction: 
>> https://godbolt.org/z/1bePhvaG4
>
> Yes confirming this. In the errno.h header the function is declared: extern 
> int *__errno_location (void) __attribute__ ((__nothrow__ )) __attribute__ 
> ((__const__)); 
> Since we can't really change the header, this needs to be changed in the 
> compiler?

Yeah, I think this is a bug with your patch, but I'm not certain where. I 
suspect the changes to CGBuiltin.cpp are what are causing this issue -- CC 
@efriedma and @rjmccall as they might have ideas.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151834/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151834

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to