chenzheng1030 wrote: > Is it possible that we fix the hack implementation with some future version > (I will open an issue and work on it afterwards)? How about let's move on > with current approach? > @amy-kwan @stephenpeckham @bzEq @chenzheng1030 Appreciate your comments. > Thank you!
I am not against this proposal given the internal timeline. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66316 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
