chenzheng1030 wrote:

> Is it possible that we fix the hack implementation with some future version 
> (I will open an issue and work on it afterwards)? How about let's move on 
> with current approach?
> @amy-kwan @stephenpeckham @bzEq @chenzheng1030 Appreciate your comments. 
> Thank you!

I am not against this proposal given the internal timeline.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66316
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to