sbc100 wrote: > But `--no-trap-after-noreturn` didn't exist before, so there was no way to > specify that from the command line. You _created_ it, originally in this PR, > and then the split-off PR in #67051. If this is a bugfix, it sounds like you > are fixing a bug of your own making.
I think perhaps the misunderstanding here is that `NoTrapAfterNoreturn` was usable/settable by compilers such as rust via the LLVM API, even though `--no-trap-after-noreturn` didn't exist in llvm itself? So adding this option just allows us to test something that wasn't testable, but was exposed via the API? Is that right? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65876 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
