alexshap added a subscriber: alexshap.

================
Comment at: clang-rename/RenamingAction.cpp:74
@@ +73,3 @@
+      // FIXME: As for clang-rename, adding a replacement fails IFF either the
+      // AST node has been matched multiple times (which shouldn't happen in
+      // reality, need to fix that). For now, just ignore the error as it
----------------
Let's consider the following example:
src/include/Point.h:
   struct Point {};
src/a.cpp: 
   include <Point.h>
src/b.cpp:
   include <Point.h>
clang-rename -qualified-name Point -new-name Point2 srcs/a.cpp srcs/b.cpp
Renaming failed in /Users/Alexshap/PlayRename/srcs/./include/Point.h! New 
replacement:
/Users/Alexshap/PlayRename/srcs/./include/Point.h: 7:+5:"Point2"
conflicts with existing replacement:
/Users/Alexshap/PlayRename/srcs/./include/Point.h: 7:+5:"Point2"

The thing is that clang-rename is trying to modify the same code twice (as in 
the example) and the return value (Error) of the method Replacements::add 
doesn't allow us to distinguish two cases: A. conflict (trying to apply 
different modifications to the same source code) B. (still conflict, but 
different) (trying to apply the same modification twice). 
In the past when Replacements was a typedef on std::set and clang-rename was 
using insert(...) the case B wasn't an issue. 
P.S. However (imo) the new (FIXME) comment seems to be a little bit misleading.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D24914



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to