tru wrote: We guarantee abi/api stability between the patch versions, so I would say no. Maybe if we think it's critical enough we could do a 17.1.0, but this doesn't seem to be the case when reading the description at least. Is this a regression from LLVM 16?
I could be convinced, but my default outlook would be NO abi/api breaks unless absolutely 100% necessary. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66816 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
