tbaederr wrote:

Well, this is not going to make a noticeable difference in runtime. 
https://reviews.llvm.org/D155548 didn't land because there are no measurements 
to make where this makes a measurable difference.

As for my earlier comment, it would also make sense to rename that function to 
`computeBitWidth()` or just cache the computed value (we compute it when 
parsing anyway to diagnose 0 size, etc. right?).

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66203
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to