================ @@ -6171,6 +6171,9 @@ def warn_signed_bitfield_enum_conversion : Warning< "signed bit-field %0 needs an extra bit to represent the largest positive " "enumerators of %1">, InGroup<BitFieldEnumConversion>, DefaultIgnore; +def warn_bitfield_too_small_for_integral_type : Warning< + "bit-field %0 (%1 bits) is not wide enough to store type of %2 ">, + InGroup<Conversion>, DefaultIgnore; ---------------- vabridgers wrote:
Thanks @AaronBallman. I've tried the change I made on our internal code base, and see quite a few interesting findings we had not seen before. I will try the change on llvm/clang, and a few open source projects and report back. I'll also consider the gcc phrasing as a suggested improvement for the message. Best! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68276 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
