================ @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ +//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// +// +// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. +// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. +// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception +// +//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// + +#ifndef _LIBCPP___ALGORITHM_PSTL_BACKENDS_OPENMP_BACKEND_ANY_OF_H +#define _LIBCPP___ALGORITHM_PSTL_BACKENDS_OPENMP_BACKEND_ANY_OF_H + +#include <__algorithm/any_of.h> +#include <__algorithm/pstl_backends/cpu_backends/backend.h> +#include <__algorithm/pstl_backends/openmp/backend.h> +#include <__config> +#include <__type_traits/is_execution_policy.h> + +#if !defined(_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_PSTL) && _LIBCPP_STD_VER >= 17 + +_LIBCPP_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_STD + +template <class _ExecutionPolicy, class _ForwardIterator, class _Predicate> +_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI bool +__pstl_any_of(__omp_backend_tag, _ForwardIterator __first, _ForwardIterator __last, _Predicate __pred) { ---------------- ldionne wrote:
You should look at the updated documentation for backend functions in `libcxx/include/__algorithm/pstl_backend.h`. They now return `optional`. The `optional`s are used to represent whether the implementation failed to run the algorithm due to a setup issue. For example in the CPU backends we sometimes need to allocate memory and that can fail. When that fails, we return an empty optional and the front-end of the PSTL will then throw `std::bad_alloc` for us. In your case I think there's nothing that can throw or fail so far, so you should always return an engaged optional. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66968 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits