philnik777 wrote: > One thing I REALLY hate about our pattern of using bitfields for enums, is > that it becomes pretty trivial to add an entry to an enum and forget to > increase the size of the bitfield. I think such a attribute could cause a > diagnostic of `bitfield says it holds an ENUM type, but can't store all the > values`, which would be INCREDIBLY valuable (not that I'm pushing that this > patch IMPLEMENT that, but more that I'm saying such a name COULD do that, and > probably should as well). > > So in conclusion, I don't mind the name, but also prefer something more > general.
Couldn't we add a warning for that in general? Seems like a pretty useful one to me. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69104 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
