ChuanqiXu added a comment. In D108905#4654411 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D108905#4654411>, @MaskRay wrote:
> In D108905#4654410 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D108905#4654410>, @smeenai wrote: > >> In D108905#4654403 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D108905#4654403>, @ChuanqiXu >> wrote: >> >>> In D108905#4654393 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D108905#4654393>, @smeenai >>> wrote: >>> >>>> In D108905#2975712 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D108905#2975712>, @rsmith >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> No decision as yet, but so far it looks very likely that we'll settle on >>>>> the rule that exceptions cannot have potentially-throwing destructors, >>>>> and that we should reject `throw`s of such types. I don't think that >>>>> should be applied retroactively to C++98, though, because destructors >>>>> were not implicitly non-throwing back then. >>>> >>>> Were there any updates here? This seems like a useful change for us, and I >>>> was wondering if it could be unblocked now. >>> >>> What @rsmith talked about is in the standard-wise. I mean, if you feel this >>> is useful, it is possible to add an compiler option to enable this. I've >>> filed an issue to track this: >>> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/57375. My plan was to make this >>> happen this year. >> >> Yup, an option to enable this would be great for us. > > I am happy to revive the patch with an option? Any suggestion to the name? > CC1 or Driver? In our downstream, we use the name `-fdisable-exception-with-may-throw-dtor` as a Driver option. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D108905/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D108905 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
