EricWF wrote:

I'm tempted to just do the non-conforming thing here (because -fno-exceptions 
is non-conforming), and just assume that when you're building with 
-fno-exceptions, you're not trying to replace the throwing operator new,  and 
you'll be fine if we have the throwing kind call the non-throwing kind. 

Is that totally insane?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69498
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to