EricWF wrote: > We currently support both ways of building the library (-fexceptions and > -fno-exceptions). I don't know how widely used the -fno-exceptions variant is > used and we could discuss dropping it (and forcing people to always build the > library itself with -fexceptions), but IMO this should be a separate change. > In practice, I suspect that a lot of folks in the embedded world might be > building the library with -fno-exceptions.
My only concern is that this change introduces a bunch of black-magic, which I suspect is pretty fragile (but I don't know), and I would like to avoid that if possible. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69498 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
